Friday, 10 February 2012

WASHED AWAY...


I wonder what the poor people living in Queensland and New South Wales are thinking of Tim Flannery, the government’s climate guru, as they watching their homes flood for the third time in as many years?

In truth, they’re possibly not giving two shits about the Climate Commissioner of Australia right about now.  They’ll be too busy evacuating their homes.  Again.

We were told by Mr Flannery, who I will point out has no foundations in science or the climate in any way, but has been appointed by the government as an expert, that:

Perth will run out of water in a matter of years, and become a ghost town, unless they build a desalination plant.

The eastern cities will run out of water.  Quote:
Climate Commissioner Tim Flannery in 2005 warned of permanent drought in NSW, thanks to global warming:
But since 1998 particularly, we’ve seen just drought, drought, drought, and particularly regions like Sydney and the Warragamba catchment - if you look at the Warragamba catchment figures, since ‘98, the water has been in virtual free-fall, and they’ve got about two years of supply left, but something will need to change in order to see the catchment start accumulating water again.... So when the models start confirming what you’re observing on the ground, then there’s some fairly strong basis for believing that we’re understanding what’s causing these weather shifts and these rainfall declines, and they do seem to be of a permanent nature
Well, the worst-case scenario for Sydney is that the climate that’s existed for the last seven years continues for another two years. In that case, Sydney will be facing extreme difficulties with water.
Tim Flannery.
We were told that drought will be the norm, and heavy rains that fill our catchments will never come again.

We were told that any Australian citizen that is living on the coastline will face the danger of rising water levels from melting polar caps in years to come.

‘Anyone with a coastal view from their bedroom window, or their kitchen window, or where ever, is likely to lose their house as a result of that change, so anywhere, any coastal cities, coastal areas, are in grave danger’.

Tim Flannery.

We were told that unless we take action, and take it now, temperatures will increase; water levels will rise as the caps melt, and life as we know it will cease to exist.  Well, almost. 

Now, to be fair, we know that predicting the weather is a science, and one that is not always accurate.  Predicting the impact of ‘global warming’ on the climate is clearly much, much harder.

Oh, forgive my political incorrectness: it’s not global warming anymore; it’s climate change.  Lord forbid I encourage you to think that the planet is warming, when it’s clearly not. 

Queensland has flooded three times in a couple of years; same as New South Wales.  Victoria has seen excessive water in places that have never seen it at all.  If you speak to our men of the land; our farmers that have lived through generations of seasonal changes, they all tell you the same thing: droughts come in cycles, and so do the rains. 

We are, after all, a land of droughts and flooding rains.

So, along comes the shift in name now.  As I said; no more ‘global warming’.  We’re all about climate change now.

Climate change is the new ‘global warming’.

Forgive my sarcasm, but as I read that our reservoirs in Victoria are near to capacity, when I see half of Queensland and New South Wales floating away again, I cannot help but wonder what the truth really is.

For one, it’s definitely not global warming.  Maybe it is climate change?  I wonder if the rains and storms are heavier than they have been in cycles gone by.  I wonder if, when a drought breaks, the land is so dry that it can’t take all of the water at once, and it floods.  Then, I wonder if the land becomes so sodden, that it can’t take any more, and it floods.

Sure; things like Cyclone Yasi don’t help.  That was completely and utterly decimating, and we felt the devastation of that storm thousands of kilometres away, and watched it on telly from the safety of our dry homes.

Mother Nature can be so cruel.

So one wonders if we are causing this, or is it just nature restoring the balance and cleansing the earth again?

If we are causing this climate change, do we now have to stop taking our planet for granted, and start caring for it?  Because my friends; it would be apparent that Mother Nature kicks back pretty hard.

I’m sure driving hybrid cars, buying appliances that are greener, planting more trees, having less farting cows and walking and riding our bikes everywhere will make a massive difference to our lives.  No doubt about it.

However, when 22 million people in Australia do this, what is the impact against the 22 million people living in an Asian city the size of Melbourne that don’t?

Is it all pointless?  Pointless when Australia is only 1.9% of the global problem?

You could read this and think ‘why bother?’  That would be a natural and forgivable reaction.  However, why can’t we try?  We may improve our lives a little, and at least we can say ‘we tried’.

However, by Mr Flannery’s own admission, what we do now won’t have an impact on the global situation for some 700 to 1000 years.

‘Just let me finish and say this. If the world as a whole cut all emissions tomorrow the average temperature of the planet is not going to drop in several hundred years, perhaps as much as a thousand years because the system is overburdened with CO2 that has to be absorbed, and that only happens slowly.’

Tim Flannery, MTR Radio, March 24, 2011

Now in fairness, any action we take now will make an immediate impact, I believe.  It will stop the CO2 levels from rising.  It won’t lower them or eradicate the ‘overburdened system’.  It will help, but it won’t ‘fix’ the problem.

So far, nearly every prediction this man has made about the climate has been scientifically disproven.  Forget scientifically; have a look at Queensland, and you’ll see just how wrong he was.

I don’t Mr Flannery even believes the hype himself, because he purchased a property only several meters from the tidal waters around the Hawkesbury estuary. 

According to property searches, in 1997 Professor Flannery bought one house on the Hawkesbury with his wife, Alexandra Leigh Szalay, for $274,000.  Five years later—even as climate scientists, including Professor Flannery, claimed evidence of global warming and rising sea levels was even more solid—the couple bought the property next door, for $505,000
Mr Flannery’s response to this?

For a week, Professor Flannery declined to speak to journalists about his properties, but he broke his silence yesterday to tell The Weekend Australian that while waterfront property generally was at risk, his little bit of paradise was secure for his lifetime.
There is no chance of it being inundated, short of a collapse of the Greenland Ice Shelf,”
Tim Flannery.
There’s more interesting reading for you in the attached article, but I’ll show you this little snippet:

Kevin Rudd doesn’t believe Tim Flannery, either:
Yesterday, the former prime minister and his wife Therese Rein put some high-profile faith in both the Brisbane property market and its resistance to flooding by buying a block of dirt near the river in his electorate of Griffith.

So where does that leave us?  Is there a threat to the climate or not?  Is it all as serious as we’ve been lead to believe?

Or is it all just a political game fuelled by money, and we’re the suckers paying for it.

Who knows?

What I do know though, is that I will go to sleep in my comfortable bed, cooled by my environmentally friendly evaporative cooling, which obtains water from my tanks, whilst my water and energy efficient washing machine and dishwasher run through their nightly cycle, using biodegradable detergents.

I will wake in the morning, and shower in water heated by my solar powered hot water service, and drive to work in my economical small car.  I will return home and cook steak, from cows we bred ourselves, and prepare salad and vegetables from our own garden, and eggs from our own chickens.

I will watch minimal television, even though it’s an energy efficient big-screen plasma, in semi darkness; the room illuminated by a couple of candles from the kitchen table in the next room.  I’m not reading, so why turn on the light?

On the weekend, I will tend to my acre of garden, sharing the cuttings between the chickens and the goat, save clogging up the local tip refuse. I may even go grocery shopping, ensuring I make use of my fabric shopping bags.  

My husband will tend to our cows, who are single handedly destroying the environment by farting.  We may plant a few more fruit trees to counterbalance that, though.

What about you?

Peace out.

No comments:

Post a Comment